Last month the Citizen published Tom Sharpe’s article on PreReal Investment’s purchase of over 400 properties around T or C. A few days later the Citizen was accused of racism (at the worst) or ethnic stereotyping (at the least):
i was absolutely stunned by the author’s defensive presentation of his
unfounded accusations rooted in bigoted xenophobia and encourage you
to hire an editor and request that this angle be removed. i am not the
only offended italian-american in sierra county today. (Sara Chev)
Because Tom is a new writer for the Citizen, his article was vetted and edited (about 2 hours of discussions and reworkings and 6 hours of technical work on the images in the article). The board of the Citizen takes full responsibilities for the article. We also take seriously the accusation by presuming that the accusation is not a frivolous troll but an honest expression of feelings. The board, therefore, apologizes to Sara and to others who may have been hurt, offended, or angered by the article.
That being said, however, the board, after many re-readings of the article, finds nothing that demonstrates objectively that Tom’s inquiry hinged on ethnic stereotyping of Italian Americans. You can check out the article again at https://sierracountycitizen.org/money-flows-from-staten-island-to-sierra-county-to-buy-property-with-help-from-tax-deferments/.
We appreciate Tom not only giving us information on an enormously important aspect of social and economic life in the county but showing us the investigative process he followed on the way. If you follow his story, then, you will see that he is centrally following a series of associations, beginning with the oddity that the real estate development company has a name (Integrated Environmental Services) that sounds like a landfill. Associations, categorical thinking, type casting, generic expectations are how investigations, whether in journalism or in science operate. In fact, they are the stuff of everyday life. If we are looking for where someone lives in an unfamiliar neighborhood, we go by the architectural type of a house and do not stop at what looks like gas stations or big box stores. Stereotyping is normal. Here, Tom’s association is between a type of naming and landfills generally.
As an investigator his next step is verification, and he inquires, only to have Mr. Berman offer the next association, that between landfills and organized crime. Still pursuing the oddity of the name in spite of Mr. Berman’s denial, Tom finds Mr. Berman owns a landfill in Staten Island. That location seems to verify public suspicion (according to Mr. Berman) of a link between Integrated Environmental Services and organized crime because Staten Island landfills were notoriously connected with organized criminality. If you are not familiar with that notoriety, check out the activities of the Capone brothers, Albert and Stephen, who pleaded guilty to bribing the Fish Kill landfill on Staten Island, at the time the largest dump in the world. See, for example, https://www.propublica.org/article/a-trash-industry-union-thrives-and-employees-say-they-are-left-holding-the-bag and
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/bic/downloads/pdf/denials/tradewaste/capone_and_denilo_inc-163-denial-12-15-2000.pdf. [The Capones at one time had a construction company called Enopac, their surname backwards, which contracted with the FBI to dig for bodies of mafia victims: https://www.nydailynews.com/2004/12/05/feds-fooled-by-shady-firm-called-enopac-the-company-name-is-capone-written-backward-which-should-be-a-clue-a-daily-news-investigation-into-city-and-law-agency-links-to-companies-with-organized-crime-b/]
That some Italian Americans were prominent in the corruption of the garbage business in New York City is simply a fact, but one entirely beside the point of Tom’s investigation. He did not look for connections to organized crime because of Mr. Prendamano’s Italian name but simply followed another path, the association between Staten Island landfills and corruption. Tom’s process in the article simply ignores the Italian American connection to Staten Island landfills.
In his conversation with Mr. Prendamano, Tom shows the reader the most telling demonstration of his avoidance of the Italian American stereotype. Tom’s remark to Mr. Prendamano about The Sopranos speaks entirely to the connection between organized crime and landfills without mention of Italian Americans, even though that was very much part of the series. It is Mr. Prendamano who brings in the Italian American stereotyping.
Furthermore, we accept the generality that in one way or another we are all prejudiced and can hardly claim to have escaped the social ambiance we grew up in and live in. The only way to deal with that in ourselves is to think about it. It is possible, as Tom himself said to me, that he has unwittingly bought into the Italian American stereotype. However, we do not think so. The article’s story line carefully avoids reference to that association even though it is in plain sight, available to him as an investigative path from the very beginning. Yet, he studiously avoids it in the article. To us this means that even if he were prejudiced, he has successfully avoided that temptation. We don’t think we can ask for more objectivity than that.
For those who were hurt by our article, I would like to suggest that they revisit the ethnic cliché. Is it really such a terrible thing to be associated in some loose way to criminality or is that just a knee-jerk morality? Many ethnic groups trying to assimilate to American culture had to deal with xenophobic prejudice. A common method was to organize secret structures of protection characterized by a strong devotion to ethnic identity. These organizations were essentially outside the law (because the law was prejudiced or controlled by those that were; that is, criminality is not necessarily the same as morality).
This is true of the Irish, of Chinese, of Jews, of Africans, of Italians, of Mexicans, of the Central Americans. How they structured these resistances to xenophobia may differ because of the cultures they came from, but their efforts were often perceived by the dominant culture as criminal. That illegality is part of cultural assimilation, the American experience. One need not be ashamed of it. This is how one should understand attempts like The Sopranos, The Godfather, or Goodfellas to fully deal with the Italian American experience, its history, its tensions, and its humanity. In the Godfather series we see how a Sicilian structure of social control under the pressure of assimilation morphs into a capitalistic corporate structure. In The Sopranos the story flows out of the main character’s psychoanalysis, a clear indication that he has a psyche, that is, a soul. That basis should undermine the simplistic take that he is morally “bad.” He’s not the story’s villain. ‘The Sopranos’ Offered the Best Insight into Italian-American Life (vice.com). These are efforts to undermine the ethnic stereotype by taking apart the stereotype, contextualizing it in the shared, as well as the particular, and the difficult process of cultural assimilation in a hostile society, by peopling it with lived experiences.
These stories resist racial prejudice by turning it upside down, incorporating the stereotype as an aspect to understand about one’s ethnicity, perhaps even to allow it to be embraced. The same thing happens when Blacks call each other “nigga,” say “Black is beautiful,” or defuse the racism by generalizing it in a word like dis.
I am concerned that residents are focusing on anything other than some new Yorkers of any persuasion are buying up everything in sight without any rational reason other than stashing a lot of capital gains to avoid taxes and to get another windfall from investing in an opportunity zone. Regular people won’t be able to afford to live here. And what are we compared of here? Regular people. Where should we move?
I have no idea what you’re talking about and what the references to bigotry and xenophobia refer to. He is an experienced writer with decades of experience and had written an EXCELLENT previous article for the Citizen. There’s nothing to apologize for. While EXISTING stereotypes were discussed no accusations were made. This sounds as though those who have a financial interest in the properties purchased or the corporations that purchased them had no other avenue of attack than a ridiculous cheap shot.
I am never ceased to be amazed by people reading something, interpret what read through their own filters and then take umbrage at their own interpretation. Toms article was great, answered a number of questions I had and allowed me closure on the 20+ years of my life attempting to return T or C (Hot Springs) to a place of healing it had been for 1000’s of years.
Aside from Kathleen’s articles, it was refreshing to read a well researched article that contributed to my understanding.
When the Mayor tells the community for whom a meeting was called, that there will be NO discussion, only info given and people removed for trying to contribute, we are in deep trouble! Where is the outrage for this? Why are the people who own and pay for the community not outraged?
PS The comments section is broken -thanx!
A well thought out response to a basicallu inane (my stereotype)
complaint. Good job! Thank you and keep up the fine work.
While I think one poorly written and thought out comment about a great piece was at best an overreaction, I think your own lengthy and unnecessary response was an overreaction in itself.
As an aside that all of you might feel is abusive because I see things differently—-During the years I was a commissioner (volunteer) on Planning and zoning, the federal EPA shut down our city dump out of town. The groundwater is 500 feet out there. When I was a new instructor at an Agriculture college in LA County, I had to drive 50 miles to dump 500# of outlawed DDT from our pesticide shed. And that dump was not nearly as safe as ours. Instead we have an expensive collection site that I understand has fouled one of our precious city water wells. And our ranch properties are a dumping ground across the river for all the folks who cannot afford to pay at the collection site. I understand that there is a way to open that dump again, instead of just sitting around debating what is and isn’t “politically correct”. PS If you take the time to talk to visitors downtown this is still a place of healing that is badly needed from the shape our surrounding cities are in. And economic development for tourism and a better brand of retirees means Sierra County won’t have to keep exporting our home grown young adults to other communities because of all the drugs and poverty consciousness built around the idea of a cheap place to live.
I’m amazed that anyone would see this article as being anything other than informational about outsiders coming into town and buying up property/developing properties.
There was nothing in that article that needed to be apologized for and I hope the accusations do not hinder further well-researched/truthful articles. We desperately need this type of journalism in Sierra County.
There are some interesting points here which have absolutely nothing to do with this particular article. I suppose you must think this discussion was too “politically correct”. Many of us who are retirees spend as much of our income as possible at businesses here. If you want what you consider a ‘better brand of retirees” why don’t you pack up and move to Sedona? I personally would like a better brand of development than an out-of-state corporation with investors to satisfy rather than local citizens.
Peter, please forgive my reference to a “better brand of retirees”— I just meant those whose main purpose was to find a cheap place to retire, with little to offer those who are raising children. I grew up in Yuma, AZ and raised my children here in T or C. In 35 years here, we have seen lots of change, but I feel we have a ways to go. BTW–Out here we pride ourselves in not being rude to friends and strangers alike. Mostly, I was trying to make folks who might be new to the area aware that we have a trash problem that these newcomers may be able to help us with. Again, I apologize for my inability to connect those dots and writing off the main topic
Absolutely! And that is greatly appreciated. My central observation is that there is a long list of articles and research dealing with the detrimental effect of massive corporate investment in real estate. The percentage of seniors and people living below the poverty level is disproportionately high in Sierra County and they will be the ones paying the price for gentrification. Capitalism can be very beneficial but it is also amoral and making as much money as possible can take precedent over those that are harmed in the process.