Stuff you need to know, 1.16.23

“No eyes on the skies”
by Lindsay Fendt, Searchlight New Mexico
January 12, 2023

New Mexico’s rules to curb greenhouse gas emissions are some of the strongest in the country, but there’s a catch: They rely on the gas and oil industry to police itself and accurately report its own emissions. And, out in the field, it’s clear that things are already slipping through the cracks. 

Click on the above link to read this free-access report.

“Oil” and Gas Operator Pays Millions for Clean Air Act Violations “
by Jerry Redfern, Capital and Main, republished in The Paper
January 15, 2023

An agreement between WildEarth Guardians and an oil and gas company that dramatically cuts excess oilfield pollution at a facility in southern New Mexico could be a model both for quicker resolutions to pollution violations and a legal roadmap for private groups looking to hold fossil fuel companies to account under the Clean Air Act.

Click on the above link to read this free-access article.

“New Mexico ranchers want EPA to crack down on oil and gas emissions”
by George Gonzales, KRQE News 13
January 13, 2023

New Mexico ranchers showed up last week to speak out at the public forums being held by the Environmental Protection Agency as they consider a crackdown on harmful pollutants.

Click on the above link to read this free-access article.

TAGS

Share This Post
Diana Tittle
Diana Tittle

Diana Tittle, a member of the board of Sierra County Public-Interest Journalism Project, was the editor of the Sierra County Sun, the Citizen's precursor. A former resident of Truth or Consequences who now lives part-time in northern New Mexico, she spent her 42-year professional career in Cleveland, Ohio, where she worked as a newspaper reporter, magazine writer and editor, book author and publisher and publishing consultant. She is the recipient of a Cleveland Arts Prize for Literature.

Posts: 332

One comment

  1. The Searchlight story and Capital and Main story appear to have a difference of opinion on self reporting. Searchlight’s research shows flaring and venting that go unreported and Capital and Main claim the reporting is accurate. In my past reporting on air quality pollution (Iowa), the EPA permits required the companies to install devices on stacks that capture emissions data, i.e., particulate, quantity, and what chemicals are being emitted. Therefore onsite monitoring is not necessary, because the devices are doing it. But I guess the companies can remove the devices. In Iowa, the government air quality inspectors only inspected each company about once every five years. But they too, as it seems NM air quality inspectors do, look at the monthly self-reports. In Iowa, the reports were fudged too. And the companies payed paltry fines compared to the many millions they made while exceeding emissions standards.

    The taxpayer should not have to pay the salaries of many many inspectors to make these companies comply. Foolproof devices that capture air emissions data and massive fines for having devices that don’t work would be one solution. The devices should be hooked to automatic read outs that cannot be faked by company self-reporters. Industry should pay for this, not the taxpayers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment Fields

Please tell us where you live. *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.