Hearing on Copper Flat Mine, IV: Sierra County can’t afford to gamble with our water

Sierra County can’t afford to gamble with our water

By Lee Newman, owner of Animas Creek Nursery

 

More than 20 years ago, my wife and I were looking for a place to grow trees.

We looked all over the country, from Florida to Louisiana and places in between. We chose Las Animas Creek in Sierra County.

We chose it because of the water, the beauty and the landscape. We bought a small farm and built a tree-growing operation there. At our busiest, we shipped thousands of trees a week during the growing season, many of them destined for communities across New Mexico.

We thought we’d keep doing it for a long time.

Instead, I’m taking the greenhouses down to move them.

Lower Animas Creek, which used to be a permanent stream, hasn’t run in years. Over the past three or four years, I’ve watched conditions get worse. For roughly a year and a half, we haven’t had enough water coming through the pipeline we use from farther up the creek to keep the operation going. I’ve started moving our production back to Santa Fe.

That experience shapes how I think about the proposed Copper Flat mine.

New Mexico Copper Corporation wants to reopen the mine near Hillsboro, just a few miles from where I live. The company has changed its proposal and says the mine would use less water than it proposed previously. But people who live along Las Animas Creek and experts who have reviewed the proposal continue to raise serious questions about whether the company has enough water for both mining and reclamation–and what its groundwater pumping would mean for the people who already depend on this water.

Those aren’t hypothetical questions for us.

Years ago, during an earlier hearing on Copper Flat, I asked what would happen to the small farms along Las Animas Creek if mine pumping affected our water. I remember being reassured that our existing water rights would protect us and that people could drill new wells.

But anyone who lives on a small farm knows it’s not that simple.

A right to water on paper doesn’t put water back in a well. Drilling a deeper well costs money, and there is no guarantee you’ll find the water you need. Small farmers and rural families shouldn’t be expected to shoulder that risk so a mining company can operate.

I don’t say that because I believe we can simply stop mining.

My father was a mining engineer. I’ve worked in mines myself. My own background is in forestry and environmental engineering. I understand that our country uses copper and other minerals and will continue to need them.

But needing copper doesn’t mean every proposed mine is appropriate in every place.

We have to decide where mining can happen without sacrificing resources that communities cannot replace. Here in Sierra County, water is one of those resources.

That’s also why I don’t accept the idea that we have to choose between protecting our water and having an economic future.

I’ve spent decades making a living here. I believe Sierra County’s water, mountains, wildlife and open spaces are themselves economic assets. They support farms and ranches, local businesses and recreation. Those are things that can sustain this community long after a mine closes.

Copper Flat has been an issue for essentially the entire 25 years I’ve lived here. I know people get tired of hearing about the same proposed mine year after year. But the fact that we’ve been asked this question before doesn’t mean we should stop asking whether the answers are good enough.

Soon, the public will once again have an opportunity to weigh in on Copper Flat before the New Mexico Mining and Minerals Division.

I hope people in Sierra County will use it.

You don’t have to be a hydrologist, engineer or mining expert to have something important to say. If you depend on this water, if you make your living here, if you care about what this landscape looks like decades from now, then you have a stake in this decision.

I’ve spent a lot of years fighting to protect this place. Eventually, people of my generation have to hand that work to the next one.

What we shouldn’t hand them is a problem we could have prevented.

Before approving Copper Flat, state regulators should be able to say with confidence that the mine has the water it needs, that existing water users will be protected, and that Sierra County won’t be left carrying the consequences after the mining is done.

Until they can, the answer should be no.

 

 

Lee Newman is a longtime Sierra County resident, tree grower and co-founder of Newman’s Nursery. He has a background in forestry and environmental engineering and serves as vice president of the Percha Animas Watershed Association.

TAGS

Share This Post
Max Yeh
Max Yeh

Sierra County Public-Interest Journalism Project’s board president Max Yeh is a novelist and writes widely on language, interpretation, history, and culture. He has lived in Hillsboro, New Mexico, for more than 30 years after retiring from an academic career in literature, art history and critical theory.

Posts: 144

3 Comments

  1. Thank you so much for this, Mr. Newman (and Max Yeh). I have lived in Hillsboro for over 33 years now and am amazed that the New Mexico Copper Corporation is still wanting to reopen Copper Flats due to our decade long drought and the current condition of our water and the Rio Grande. My main concern for the decade or so they have been trying to get enough water to reopen has been the WATER they will need. Now, with their committing to ‘dry stack tailings’ comes with its own environmental problems. Dust Emissions: Dry, fine-grained surface material can easily blow away in the wind, creating air quality and community health concerns if not actively managed or suppressed.Water and Leaching Issues in Wet Climates: If heavy rain or snowmelt penetrates the stack, water can dissolve and leach heavy metals into nearby soil and groundwater.Sulfide Oxidation: When sulfide-bearing tailings are exposed to air in an unsaturated dry stack, they can oxidize and generate acidic seepage water, requiring careful geochemical monitoring and liners.
    I hope our County Commissioners will take care when listening to their constituents’ objections to the reopening of this mine. Please consider PEOPLE over profit.

  2. I understand the water issue, but it makes me wonder about the bigger picture.

    Now we’re dealing with water concerns involving the Copper Flat Mine, while our own Elephant Butte Lake is already extremely low. Water is one of the most important issues facing Sierra County, yet we continue putting money into Spaceport America.

    I’ve lived here for 20 years, and I have to ask: What is Sierra County actually getting out of all the money being put into the Spaceport? How is it directly helping the people who live here?

    Every year, it seems like we continue investing in the Spaceport while our community still struggles with basic issues like water, infrastructure and economic opportunities.

    Maybe it’s time for Sierra County to take a hard look at where our money is going and ask whether those priorities are really benefiting the people who live here.

    If our water is becoming one of our biggest concerns, shouldn’t protecting and investing in our own community come first?

  3. Screw Virgin Galactic. Nothing but lies and delays. People were putting down non refundable deposits. Ack in 2006!!! How many flights since? Now they want a data center or 2 out there? And now let’s give the miners full rein. Race to the End.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment Fields

Please tell us where you live. *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.